sounds like a stupid question but if you look around you will find that it is not at all. Until a few years ago going around I saw three categories of photographers photographing, there were professionals, super-equipped, then there's advanced amateurs driven by a passion but without claiming to live with their shots and then there were normal people with their cars compact that photograph to have a memory.
Today if you go to a place or an event you will notice that the reflex raging everywhere, why?
Many people enter a shopping mall take a camera because it costs as much as a good bridge but it's more "cool" and then do not buy a goal even more and remain with the kit which comes with the machine. These people do not get any benefit from a camera, usually used in ways never planned switch to manual settings and they just bring home a decent shot. These users are dubbed "utonti, people who do not choose according to your needs but according to the mode or the advice of the clerk on duty, people who are not documented before the purchase and believe that the more they spend, the better the picture taken.
I'm sorry that these buyers were not directed to a good bridge that, although with a smaller sensor, they would be rewarded more in terms of flexibility. I used to bridge a lot of satisfaction for all brands side by side to the camera and I know they have the enviable features such as the huge zoom range in a small body, light weight and low bulk. When I go around taking pictures that go well I have the camera slung over your shoulder with a goal that is about 2.5 Kg and if I bring a backpack well over 6 kg of equipment while a bridge, stood at 450 grams only that I need more things like ergonomics, lens dedicated to particular types of photos and tropicalization for shooting even in the rain with no worries of mind.
As an example I can cite utonto a person believes that the letter A on the dial of his camera indicate the automatically instead of the program to aperture ... a little thing that makes a clear idea of \u200b\u200bthe futility of buying a camera from this person.
I believe that not to be disappointed in life should never aspire to the top but what we really need, it would be better that a person did a photographic journey from a compact, then when and if it andargli then it should pass close to a bridge and only when this also represents a limitation of the case will then buy an SLR with all that entails in of costs.
Today we want to forge ahead, buy now the top, a course in photography a few hours and believe that you become familiar with the great art that photographers took a lifetime to understand. It would be like taking the best chassis, the best brushes, a manual of painting and think they can do because you have a picture of the best ways.
Photographers are not born, very few exceptions, you will become with time, passion, field testing, if you are willing to spend hours behind the viewfinder, if you are willing to take cold , to stand out when others fall, if you feel an inner light when shooting then I think we can hope to become photographers, otherwise not. But as always is my personal thought.
0 comments:
Post a Comment